home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.xnet.com!jcompton
- From: jcompton@flood.xnet.com (Jason Compton)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: Hooray for Amiga Tech.
- Date: 11 Feb 1996 16:25:54 GMT
- Organization: XNet - A Full Service Internet Provider - (708) 983-6064
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <4fl5ai$mra@flood.xnet.com>
- References: <rdingem.4dbq@grafix.xs4all.nl>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: monsoon.xnet.com
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Ruud Dingemans (rdingem@grafix.xs4all.nl) wrote:
-
- : JC> While the Amiga has never really offered a ton of raw horsepower, it's
- : JC> finessed itself against the competition to the point where it was a
- : JC> reasonable tradeoff.
-
- : Yes. I still think it's reasonable *IF* the price is low enough.
- : If it ain't - and I'm talking $ 500 or less for a bare 1200 here -
- : it's indeed losing out.
-
- Any price increase in the computer market over time is suicidal. $500 is
- still $100 more than Commodore sold it for 2 years ago. If you want to
- talk $300, that's a possibility.
-
- : JC> But we've all heard the price comparisons to low-end DX4s and Macs, and
- : JC> you have to understand that Joe Public making a buying decision won't
- : JC> care that the 030 is many times faster than the A500, because that's
- : JC> still many times slower than the P90.
-
- : Sure, but not everybody has the money to buy a P90. It's not
- : only comparisions, but also hard-cash budget limitations that
- : affect the sale of a computer. In the 80's, people bought $ 300 C64's
- : because they couldn't afford $ 1000 PC's. I still think that applies
- : in the 90's.
-
- Except those people don't have a $300 alternative anymore, they have a
- $600 alternative that looks pretty silly next to the $1000 DX4 sitting
- next to it, because the DX4 has a monitor.
-
- : > The usability of a computer depends not on its comparison to other
- : > CPU's, but on what can be done with it. And even an '020 is plenty for
- : > some simple wordprocessing, some Netting and some games, which is what
- : > most people (according to multiple user inquiries) use a computer for.
-
- : JC> Sure, we think so. But the market dictates that such a general purpose
- : JC> computer must either be sold with more power or for less money. So
- : JC> far, AT is offering neither.
-
- : Partly true, but an A1200 is still a bit cheaper than your average
- : PC over here, since it has sound & vision on the motherboard and
- : needs less resources/hardware. Still, the gap has indeed narrowed
- : considerably. (With a PPC 60x, things should be a lot better,
- : of course - mass-produced CHRP motherboards and all.)
-
- People could care less if the sound and video are on the motherboard or
- not. And while the Amiga is CHEAPER than a few clones, it's not offering
- the same value to a regular consumer.
-
- : It still exists only because its users WANT IT TO - with a vigour
- : probably never seen before in computing.
-
- I'll buy that.
-
- --
- Jason Compton jcompton@xnet.com
- Editor-in-Chief, Amiga Report Magazine (708) 741-0689 FAX
- You know you're on the way out... it's just a matter of time.
- AR on Aminet - docs/mags/ar???.lha AR Mailing list - Mail me
- WWW - http://www.omnipresence.com/Amiga/News/AR, www.cucug.org/ar/ar.html
-